A site scan can tell you 1,428 things are wrong.It can’t tell you which one to fix first.
Your team does not need another long file. It needs to know which job to start on Monday and what it is worth. So each problem is scored against the others, and against what the client pays you for.
- Site and content problems
- Ranked, not just counted
- Scored against AI results
- Orphaned pages618
- Missing structured data334
- Thin or duplicate pages246
- Broken internal links127
- Missing meta descriptions86
- Crawl failures12
- Slow LCP templates5
Stop drowning in Google data. Know what to do next.
A site scan finds 1,428 problems. Embrisk puts them in order. Your team starts with the one that matters most to the client.
What most tools hand you
1,428
issues detected
- Orphaned pages618
- Missing structured data334
- Thin or duplicate pages246
- Broken internal links127
- Missing meta descriptions86
- Crawl failures12
- Slow LCP templates5
Every row is true. But none says which one your team should fix on Monday, or what it is worth.
What Embrisk hands you
Demo data- ContentAlder Accounting
Create a comparison page for the two prompts you lose most
Publish a structured comparison covering pricing, multi-entity support and migration, with a summary table near the top.
ImpacthighEffortmedium - AI visibilityAlder Accounting
Claim the review listing that now sits behind 1 in 10 category answers
Submit and verify a listing, then keep pricing and feature facts current on it.
ImpacthighEffortlow - TechnicalAlder Accounting
Mark up the payroll answers the restructured page is already quoted for
Generate FAQPage markup from the copy already on the page and validate it.
ImpactmediumEffortlow - TechnicalBright Legal
Fix crawl failures on 12 service URLs
Correct the status codes and resubmit the affected URLs.
ImpacthighEffortlow
The order is based on how much a fix may help, how much work it is, AI answers and the client’s goal. When the client’s goal changes, the list changes.
Four things decide the order.
We show all four. If you cannot check how a list was ranked, it is just a guess with a number on it.
This comes from what the pages already do: how often they show in Google, how high they sit, and which AI questions they could answer. It does not treat every broken link the same.
One change that fixes 34 pages at once is not the same job as one custom page. If a list treats them the same, your team works in the wrong order.
Say a page looks broken to search tools. It does not just drop out of Google. AI tools also stop using it as a source. Problems that hurt both go above problems that hurt one.
The list is scored against the goal set for that client. A client who wants to keep their spot and one who wants to break into a new field need different first jobs.
The same fault costs you twice.
Google tools and AI tools used to measure different things. So it made sense to keep them apart. Now they more and more look at the same page.
If a search tool cannot read a page, it cannot link to it. If a page has no clear answer, nothing can quote it. If the client has no page that compares options, they go missing from Google and AI answers for the same reason.
Looked at apart, that is two problems in two tools. Looked at together, it is one fix that helps twice. That is just the kind of job that belongs at the top of the list.
Find out which of your clients AI is skipping.
Pick one client. Within 24 hours, we email you a free snapshot of how AI sees them. No call and no card needed.
Name one client
Their website, and where to send the result.
We ask the AI tools
12 questions their customers ask, on three AI tools.
Email within 24 hours
Where they stand, plus the first three fixes.